As an Organizational Development consultant, I have a front seat in the facilitation of building healthy, cohesive teams. Every team represents a case study of leadership and social dynamics lessons to observe and learn. Shared leadership and psychological safety influence levels of cognitive and social motivations (Sun et al., 2023). High-functioning cohesive teams compared to low dysfunctional teams reflect trust among team members. The higher the trust, the higher the effectiveness. For the last six months, one group I have been working with has unique collaborative, courageous, and fun dynamics. It is a joy to be at the table.

What makes teamwork well?

A level of trust reflects a high degree of psychological safety between team members and the leader. Psychological safety increases work performance, collaborative knowledge-sharing behavior, organizational citizenship, and lower turnover when done well. The ability to communicate openly and freely determines team members' positive work outcomes. (Liu & Keller, 2021).

“A surviving versus thriving team is marked by belonging, not bullying. ”

Consultants are typically called in when there is a problem. When there was no trust, little communication and productivity suffered. One case study of two teams I recently worked with included a group that experienced a 200% turnover over two years. Meanwhile, the second team was engaging, energetic, and innovative. The first team felt exhaustive and unengaging. The root issue of the first team was a leadership challenge after months of consultation, 360s, personality assessment, culture surveys, and team intervention. The leader style is a micromanager with inconsistent communication, favoritism, and hyper-control of the details. It is simple to see when written in plain text. However, the leaders needed to see it and be made aware of their style and its impact. Compared to the second team leader, who empowered and encouraged team members in their work. Leaders who shape and value psychological safety unleash talent and create value (Edmondson, 2019).

People are naturally motivated and thrive in inclusive environments. However, there are also significant benefits to moments of solitude, isolation, and privacy. These periods can foster creativity, provide clarity and perspective, and offer a much-needed respite from social demands. It's a delicate balance, one that each individual must navigate to find a healthy tension between belonging and being. When this equilibrium is achieved, it can significantly enhance cognitive and social motivation.

Here are three practical lessons learned and their direct applications for your next team meeting:

Lesson 1: High trust and psychological safety levels lead to more effective, cohesive teams.

Practical application: Foster an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing ideas, opinions, and concerns without fear of negative consequences. Encourage open communication and lead by example.

Lesson 2: The leadership style you adopt significantly shapes team dynamics and performance.

Practical application: Reflect on your leadership style and its effects on the team. Identify areas where you can empower team members, communicate consistently, and avoid micromanagement. Consider seeking feedback from your team to gain insights into their perceptions and needs.

Lesson 3: Striking a balance between belonging and solitude is a critical factor for individual motivation and well-being.

Practical application: Recognize that team members have different social interactions and needs for solitude. Encourage a culture that respects both collaborative work and individual-focused time. Consider implementing flexible work arrangements or designated quiet spaces to support this balance.

By applying these lessons, you can create a more psychologically safe and motivating environment for your team, ultimately improving performance and job satisfaction.

Today, I'm working with a team of local community leaders. After ten years as a consultant facilitating better teams, I'm still learning. I get to practice these three lessons for the good of the community. How about you? What can you do today to facilitate psychologically safe, high-trust teams?

Reference

Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth (1st ed.). Wiley.

Liu, Y., & Keller, R. T. (2021). How psychological safety impacts R&D project teams' performance: In a psychologically safe workplace, R&D project teams perform better, more readily share knowledge and engage in organizational citizenship behavior, and are less likely to leave. Research Technology Management, 64(2), 39-45. https://10.1080/08956308.2021.1863111

Sun, M., He, K., & Ting, W. (2023). The impact of shared leadership on team creativity in innovation Teams—A chain mediating effect model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1212. https://10.3390/su15021212